Test of nerves
The brainchild of Stuart Robertson – twenty20 – had to weather incessant criticisms by the connoisseurs of the game before ICC gave it a go-ahead as the shortest version of international cricket. So much so that even the respective boards didn't prod their stalwarts to be a part of the extravaganza, if they chose to watch the world cup from their living rooms.
As the 'circus' began, the format was subjected to microscopic examination, its finishes tickled the most dead nerves and arguably received rave reviews from the fraternity. You bet, players like Tendulkar, Ganguly, Youhana, Murli (though Murli cited health concerns) and the likes must be ruing the lost chance.
Seeing through the lens, there's more to twenty20 than what meets the eye. Some of findings are even contrary to the popular beliefs. First and the most disbelieving, the pressure is on the batsman and not the bowler. Picture this: a run-a-ball fifty is snubbed as an anchor inning and fails to evoke the compatriots' applause. On the other side, an economy rate of even 10 an over is allowed to pass without a scrutiny.
Secondly, twenty20 and spinners were not supposed to fit in the same sentence. The stats aver otherwise. Daniel Vettori single and 'left' handedly steered his team to the semi-finals. Harbhajan Singh has had more than a decent outing. Needless to mention the exploits of Shahid Afridi and Sanath Jayasuriya.
Thirdly, it is a long enough game, averaging 15 wickets per match। That implies that specialists have limited utility। All-rounders particularly, who can wield a bat can turn it on for a side। Albie Morkel is one who has maimed English bowling and dealt acceptable efforts with the leather। Misbah ul haq The all-important question—the future of cricket-- still begs an answer। The instant cricket's potential to instil assurance amongst the pigmy cricketing nations to dislodge the mighty team promises to amplify its popularity. So, if the circus is the panacea for the world cricket. So be it. Thirdly, it is a long enough game, averaging 15 wickets per match. That implies that specialists have limited utility. All-rounders particularly, who can wield a bat can turn it on for a side. Albie Morkel is one who has maimed English bowling and dealt acceptable efforts with the leather. Misbah ul haq (against India as well) and Shoaib Malik versus Australia demonstrated that it is not all about slam-banging. Keeping it simple, sticking to basics over chicanery can see your side through.
The all-important question—the future of cricket-- still begs an answer. The instant cricket's potential to instil assurance amongst the pigmy cricketing nations to dislodge the mighty team promises to amplify its popularity. So, if the circus is the panacea for the world cricket. So be it.
